It seems to me like Lanier likes technology and what it can provide for society, but he is also skeptical because he is aware of problems that may arise from technology overload. Things such as "Lock- In", where people don't stray away from the norm, causing an era of stagnant growth in our economy and civilization as a whole.
Schmidt and Cohen wholeheartedly embrace the opportunities that technology presents. They are committed to the idea that technology will benefit everyone in the future, no matter what their socioeconomic situation may be. Although I truly hope this is the case, I tend to have a little skepticism as well.
If I had to choose who I agree with more, I would have to say I prefer Lanier's view. There are a tremendous amount of things that technology can make possible in the future. Both good and bad things, unfortunately. The one point that I really agree with is the fact that its fragmenting our society. It's hard to hold a conversation with anyone without them checking their phone or tweeting ever 45 seconds. Hopefully, people learn how to balance their virtual lives and actual lives in harmony.
No comments:
Post a Comment